Shibata Eiji
   Department   School of Medicine  Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Medical Sciences
Article types journal article
Language English
Peer review Peer reviewed
Title Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement: the Japan environment and Children's study pilot.
Journal Formal name:Environmental health and preventive medicine
Abbreviation:Environ Health Prev Med
ISSN code:13474715/1342078X
Domestic / ForeginForegin
Volume, Issue, Page 22(1),28頁
Author and coauthor Tsuji Mayumi, Ayabe Tadayuki, Tanaka Rie, Senju Ayako, Shibata Eiji, Araki Shunsuke, Morokuma Seiichi, Sanefuji Masafumi, Kusuhara Koichi, Kawamoto Toshihiro
Publication date 2017/04
Summary BACKGROUND:Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution.METHODS:The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method.RESULTS:The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C.CONCLUSION:The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.
DOI 10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9
PMID 29165129